?

Log in

No account? Create an account
 

Copyright Infringement and Me - Illadore's House o Crack Page 11

About Copyright Infringement and Me

Previous Entry Copyright Infringement and Me Nov. 3rd, 2010 @ 11:14 pm Next Entry
The tl;dr version of this post: My 2005 Ice Dragon entry, called "A Tale of Two Tarts" was apparently printed without my knowledge or permission in a magazine and I am apparently the victim of copyright infringement.

The story:
I was contacted early last week by a friend of mine who lives in the Northeast about my "As American as Apple Pie - Isn't!" article that was published in Cooks Source magazine, mostly to inquire how I had gotten published. This was news to me, as I hadn't ever heard of this magazine before.

However, some basic Google-fu lead me to find them online and on Facebook. In fact, after looking at the Cooks Source Facebook page, I found the article with my name on it on on "Page 10" of the Cooks Source Pumpkin fest issue. (No worries, I have screencaps.) The magazine is published on paper (the website says they have between 17,000 and 28,000 readers) as well as being published on Facebook as well.

So. I first phone the magazine then send a quick note to the "Contact Us" information page, asking them what happened and how they got my article. (I thought it could have been some sort of mix-up or that someone posted it to some sort of free article database.) Apparently, it was just copied straight off the Godecookery webpage. As you can see from the page, it is copyrighted and it is also on a Domain name that I own.

After the first couple of emails, the editor of Cooks Source asked me what I wanted -- I responded that I wanted an apology on Facebook, a printed apology in the magazine and $130 donation (which turns out to be about $0.10 per word of the original article) to be given to the Columbia School of Journalism.

What I got instead was this (I am just quoting a piece of it here:)

"Yes Monica, I have been doing this for 3 decades, having been an editor at The Voice, Housitonic Home and Connecticut Woman Magazine. I do know about copyright laws. It was "my bad" indeed, and, as the magazine is put together in long sessions, tired eyes and minds somethings forget to do these things.
But honestly Monica, the web is considered "public domain" and you should be happy we just didn't "lift" your whole article and put someone else's name on it! It happens a lot, clearly more than you are aware of, especially on college campuses, and the workplace. If you took offence and are unhappy, I am sorry, but you as a professional should know that the article we used written by you was in very bad need of editing, and is much better now than was originally. Now it will work well for your portfolio. For that reason, I have a bit of a difficult time with your requests for monetary gain, albeit for such a fine (and very wealthy!) institution. We put some time into rewrites, you should compensate me! I never charge young writers for advice or rewriting poorly written pieces, and have many who write for me... ALWAYS for free!"


I got nothing.
Scratch that. I sure as heck do. Let's go over the major points:

  • At this point, I am mad as hell. It is now the principle of the thing -- and I also can not quite believe that my copyright was violated -- and then I was informed that I should *pay them* for editing it for me!

  • The web is NOT public domain! Don't believe me? Try the University of Maryland University College -- or just Google it.

  • I should be thankful because I wasn't flat out plagiarized? Don't college students get, oh, I dunno, tossed out for being caught for plagiarism? How is this a valid argument?

    I have some ideas of where to go from here but I am more than willing to listen to other suggestions.



    EDIT: Nick does a better job of telling the story than I do: http://nihilistic-kid.livejournal.com/1553538.html -- Thanks, Nick!
  • (Leave a comment) Page 11 of 38 - [1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] [8] [9] [10] [11] [12] [13] [14] [15] [16] [17] [18] [19] [20] [21] [22] [23] [24] [25] [26] [27] [28] [29] [30] [31] [32] [33] [34] [35] [36] [37] [38]
    [User Picture Icon]
    From:lioritgioret
    Date:November 4th, 2010 04:49 pm (UTC)

    National Writer's Union

    (Link)
    In case the 230 other comments didn't get there -- if you want legal representation, join and then contact the National Writer's Union. They have expertise in this sort of thing.
    Also, have you considered mailing a jar of urine to Cook's Source?
    (Replies frozen) (Thread)
    [User Picture Icon]
    From:sarahdotcom
    Date:November 4th, 2010 05:25 pm (UTC)

    Re: National Writer's Union

    (Link)
    pop it in a bottle labelled "Mead made to an original 14th century recipe - best enjoyed with a slice of medieval apple pie"
    (Replies frozen) (Parent) (Thread)
    From:(Anonymous)
    Date:November 4th, 2010 04:51 pm (UTC)

    Only Unrepentant Idiots Admit Guilt

    (Link)
    I only read through the first page (of five) of comments.

    Nobody in that first 20% seemed to realize (or bothered to point out) that the plagiarzation was duly admitted in the reply letter from the publisher. That is an out-right admission of guilt.

    The publisher had every opportunity to read the notice of copyright ownership and contact the author to ask permission. They chose to not do so, and spend their resources to edit and publish that which did not belong to them and which they did not have any legal right to publish, let alone edit (for any purpose other than educational or personal use).

    The tone of the letter excerpt signifies defiance and disrespect for both the law as well as creators of IP. There is no remorse, humility, or sense of accountability for their own behavior.

    IANAL! Check with an attorney first! However, it seems to me that a DCMA take-down notice/request will affect ONLY the web content. The published, dead-tree content is irrevocable. That makes the DCMA take-down ineffective at this point.

    Take 'em to court. Sue for damages, court-costs, a published (in the dead-tree magazine) apology (that is not hidden beneath a cheap-advertisement and reduced to small print on the third-to-last page), and for the insulting definition of your request for a $130 donation to a school as a "request(s) for monetary gain."
    (Replies frozen) (Thread)
    (Deleted comment)
    [User Picture Icon]
    From:thespian
    Date:November 4th, 2010 04:55 pm (UTC)

    Re: you're on twitter.com's home page top tweets

    (Link)
    writers write. they write a lot, even when they're not 'writing'. All you need to do is piss off Scalzi or Gaiman, and there goes the internet.
    (Replies frozen) (Parent) (Thread) (Expand)
    [User Picture Icon]
    From:songwind
    Date:November 4th, 2010 04:56 pm (UTC)

    Inspired my own post

    (Link)
    This is a sad and sordid tale. I hope you get it worked out to your satisfaction, whatever that may mean.

    It did prompt me to post a little rant over at my WP blog.
    (Replies frozen) (Thread)
    From:(Anonymous)
    Date:November 4th, 2010 04:58 pm (UTC)

    They admit theft in writing. DMCA

    (Link)
    File a DMCA complaint to Google and their ISP:

    http://www.google.com/dmca.html

    A public hate compaign is always good too. Are the links in your blog rel="nofollow"? If not, make sure they are, as otherwise you are just aiding their business in the search engines.
    (Replies frozen) (Thread)
    [User Picture Icon]
    From:callita623
    Date:November 4th, 2010 04:59 pm (UTC)
    (Link)
    their facebook wall is exploding with outraged people. I hope i sent a few more their way.

    (Replies frozen) (Thread)
    From:(Anonymous)
    Date:November 4th, 2010 05:01 pm (UTC)

    File a Copyright Infringement Report

    (Link)
    If you can, file a copyright infringement report with facebook explaining the situation.

    I don't expect them to take the page down, but it'd be so funny if they did. Clearly CooksSource does not invest a lot of money into their webpage and they depend heavily on facebook, it seems, to share information.

    (Replies frozen) (Thread)
    From:(Anonymous)
    Date:November 4th, 2010 05:06 pm (UTC)

    editors should protect authors, not cheat them

    (Link)
    I've been a professional editor for more than 25 years and am still surprised by what some publishers -- and authors -- think they can steal from other sources. I once edited a book whose author was a university professor who stole liberally from websites, including Wikipedia. How did I know? Whenever his writing got a little better, or he used big words or unusual phrasing he hadn't used before, I'd search the words online. Like his description of a blue jay. Sure enough, the first entry that showed up was the one he'd copied. Sometimes he even left the links from the websites in his manuscript copy. When I first caught an example, I gave him the benefit of the doubt and advised him he could not lift copy. After I kept finding more, I reminded him that he would not let his students plagiarize and neither would his publisher let him do so. He was amazingly unapologetic! If I'd had the authority I would have refused to continue to work with him. As it was, I saved him from huge embarrassment and possible legal action by catching all his cheating -- or maybe I didn't catch it all...we'll see.

    (Replies frozen) (Thread)
    From:ext_309602
    Date:November 4th, 2010 05:08 pm (UTC)

    Notify Facebook

    (Link)
    Beyond some of the other advice given here(registering your copyright, DMCA notice, etc) copyright infringement is a violation of the Facebook Terms of Service. This story has gone viral so they will likely take notice and take this seriously. File a complaint against the Cooks Source with Facebook. They may get the sight locked out or at least will be asked to take down your article.

    http://www.facebook.com/terms.php?ref=pf
    (Replies frozen) (Thread)
    [User Picture Icon]
    From:thaily
    Date:November 4th, 2010 05:11 pm (UTC)
    (Link)
    Wow, if he had any more sense he'd understand how his lack of understanding and contradictions make him look like utterly clueless scum.

    - I know about copyright, but copyrighted material on the internet isn't!
    - I stole your art, edited it sans permission and redistributed it, but you should pay me for infringing on your rights!

    Didn't his mother teach him not to steal?
    (Replies frozen) (Thread)
    [User Picture Icon]
    From:seawasp
    Date:November 4th, 2010 05:12 pm (UTC)
    (Link)
    I posted my own comments on this on my LJ too. I hope you're enjoying watching the entire Intarwebs rise up to smash this self-important fool. :)
    (Replies frozen) (Thread)
    From:(Anonymous)
    Date:November 4th, 2010 05:12 pm (UTC)

    sue

    (Link)
    I would consider a lawsuit. This woman is clearly in the wrong.
    (Replies frozen) (Thread)
    From:(Anonymous)
    Date:November 4th, 2010 05:13 pm (UTC)

    Try this

    (Link)
    This sounds like a perfect second segment for Stewart or Colbert.
    (Replies frozen) (Thread)
    From:cannualiciat
    Date:November 4th, 2010 05:15 pm (UTC)

    sickening

    (Link)
    As a small time horror author this kind of thing really sickens and pisses me off. I have retweeted your information (moonlithorrors) and will also be making my feelings known on my website and through emails and social media to the magazine.

    Just letting you know you are getting a lot of support!
    (Replies frozen) (Thread)
    [User Picture Icon]
    From:unrulynarrator
    Date:November 4th, 2010 05:16 pm (UTC)
    (Link)
    Another vote for "lawyer up."

    Open admission of plagiarism... classy.
    (Replies frozen) (Thread)
    (Leave a comment) Page 11 of 38 - [1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] [8] [9] [10] [11] [12] [13] [14] [15] [16] [17] [18] [19] [20] [21] [22] [23] [24] [25] [26] [27] [28] [29] [30] [31] [32] [33] [34] [35] [36] [37] [38]
    Top of Page Powered by LiveJournal.com