Copyright Infringement and Me
Nov. 3rd, 2010 @ 11:14 pm
version of this post: My 2005 Ice Dragon entry, called "A Tale of Two Tarts" was apparently printed without my knowledge or permission in a magazine and I am apparently the victim of copyright infringement.
I was contacted early last week by a friend of mine who lives in the Northeast about my "As American as Apple Pie - Isn't!" article that was published in Cooks Source magazine, mostly to inquire how I had gotten published. This was news to me, as I hadn't ever heard of this magazine before.
However, some basic Google-fu lead me to find them online
and on Facebook. In fact, after looking at the Cooks Source Facebook
page, I found the article with my name on it on on "Page 10" of the Cooks Source Pumpkin fest issue. (No worries, I have screencaps.) The magazine is published on paper (the website says they have between 17,000 and 28,000 readers) as well as being published on Facebook as well.
So. I first phone the magazine then send a quick note to the "Contact Us" information page, asking them what happened and how they got my article. (I thought it could have been some sort of mix-up or that someone posted it to some sort of free article database.) Apparently, it was just copied straight off the Godecookery webpage.
As you can see from the page, it is copyrighted and it is also on a Domain name that I own.
After the first couple of emails, the editor of Cooks Source asked me what I wanted -- I responded that I wanted an apology on Facebook, a printed apology in the magazine and $130 donation (which turns out to be about $0.10 per word of the original article) to be given to the Columbia School of Journalism.
What I got instead was this (I am just quoting a piece of it here:)
"Yes Monica, I have been doing this for 3 decades, having been an editor at The Voice, Housitonic Home and Connecticut Woman Magazine. I do know about copyright laws. It was "my bad" indeed, and, as the magazine is put together in long sessions, tired eyes and minds somethings forget to do these things.
But honestly Monica, the web is considered "public domain" and you should be happy we just didn't "lift" your whole article and put someone else's name on it! It happens a lot, clearly more than you are aware of, especially on college campuses, and the workplace. If you took offence and are unhappy, I am sorry, but you as a professional should know that the article we used written by you was in very bad need of editing, and is much better now than was originally. Now it will work well for your portfolio. For that reason, I have a bit of a difficult time with your requests for monetary gain, albeit for such a fine (and very wealthy!) institution. We put some time into rewrites, you should compensate me! I never charge young writers for advice or rewriting poorly written pieces, and have many who write for me... ALWAYS for free!"
I got nothing.
Scratch that. I sure as heck do. Let's go over the major points: At this point, I am mad as hell. It is now the principle of the thing -- and I also can not quite believe that my copyright was violated -- and then I was informed that I should *pay them* for editing it for me!
The web is NOT public domain! Don't believe me? Try the University of Maryland University College -- or just Google it.
I should be thankful because I wasn't flat out plagiarized? Don't college students get, oh, I dunno, tossed out for being caught for plagiarism? How is this a valid argument?
I have some ideas of where to go from here but I am more than willing to listen to other suggestions.
EDIT: Nick does a better job of telling the story than I do: http://nihilistic-kid.livejournal.com/1553538.html -- Thanks, Nick!
You have a right to free speech in this country, still. ;)
(here via nihilistic_kid
Do you have any friend who are lawyers who'd be willing to do a little work for you on a contingency basis? The amount you'd be likely to get in damages if this went to trial is probably small, but it'd be a slam dunk case, and might be worth the satisfaction just to seem them fold.
(I'm not sure if it's possible to adjudicate copyright claims in small claims court, but that would surely be the best route, since you wouldn't need a lawyer at all.)
Unknown. Looking into it. But thanks !
Agreed. People like that really need to learn lessons the hard way.
|Date:||November 4th, 2010 02:18 am (UTC)|| |
Besides legal stuff, embarrassment in public is the way to go. I'd identify some publications and media outlets that would be likely to run with a story like this. Given the ridiculous reply that you got (seriously, who DOES that?) and the completely unapologetic nature of the communication, I'd say they're deserving of whatever bad press they get over this.
(Also hi, I got here from nihilistic_kid
|Date:||November 4th, 2010 06:51 pm (UTC)|| |
site to run this on :)
i'd check w/Techdirt.com to get them to run this. they love IP/Patent type of stories!!
F%#%# mainstream publications, still think they are better than us little guys/gals :)
Copyright, schmopyright, right?
|Date:||November 4th, 2010 03:02 am (UTC)|| |
You could also entertain yourself by sending letters to their sponsors stating that the magazine they support, supports copyright infringement. :) Some people sorta freak out about that kind of thing.,
|Date:||November 4th, 2010 03:31 am (UTC)|| |
Wow, I'm stunned, I recomend White Hat Hackers.
@Anonymous "white hat hackers"
I agree that you should lawyer up. I would also start with a 'cease and desist' letter, for which I think you can probably find a nice template somewhere like www.nolo.com. Litter the letter with plenty of references to 'legal council'. This person is an idiot and there is absolutely no excuse for their behavior.
Publishing to the Internet Does Not Equal Public Domain. - h.daveno
Make that "legal counsel", and it might carry more weight. (People tend to be less scared of threats that aren't spelt correctly, due in part to the fact that, regretably, people in general are less likely to take seriously complaints from people who don't express them impeccably. Or summink. =:o\ )
|Date:||November 4th, 2010 05:04 am (UTC)|| |
OMG, I love this. It's just fantastic that an editor, someone who no doubt worries about their stuff being plagiarized already, is so brazenly plagiarizing someone else, and is not only unapologetic, but entitled!
This is too perfect. I hope this turns into a huge shitstorm for them - deservedly so.
Actually we found out that little in the mag was original. Instead most of the content was stolen.
Google did NOT lead me to the Cooks Source article, but instead to this blog! Oh my!
I stumbled onto this via a friend of a friend ... this will make a lovely Facebook update if you don't mind. These people need a spanking really really badly.
Again, this is a free country and you have a right to free speech. Assuming, you know, you live in the U.S. :)
referenced to your post from Thor's Day
saying: [...] ness. Real courage is risking one’s clichés." -- Tom Robbins Link Soup * Copyright infringement [...]
Just came across this from Twitter and astonished. Please do keep us informed of how you progress.
|Date:||November 4th, 2010 09:10 am (UTC)|| |
Monica, as a member of the media, I would like to apologise unreservedly for the inappropriate response by the editor of Cooks Source. Such a response is totally unacceptable, and as someone who generates material, copyright, regardless of medium, is something close to my heart.
I hope that Cooks Source will apologise again (without any strings attached) and give a donation to Columbia School of Journalism.
Stefan Paetow MCIJ
|Date:||November 4th, 2010 09:12 am (UTC)|| |
Re: I'm appalled!