?

Log in

No account? Create an account
 

Copyright Infringement and Me

About  

Previous Entry Copyright Infringement and Me Nov. 3rd, 2010 @ 11:14 pm Next Entry
From:ext_309751
Date:November 4th, 2010 06:56 pm (UTC)
(Link)
In general, I agree with the arguments against retaliating in kind. EXCEPT that the "editor"'s claim that the web is considered public domain should be construed as placing the web edition of their "magazine" thus in public domain (by editorial intent if not by actual law) and thus provide an ironclad defense, should it not?
(i.e., Two wrongs don't make a right, burt this is arguably not a wrong. Oh, except that they may, for all we know, have obtained other contents by similar malfeasance and one wouldn't want to magnify that.)

On second thought, class action and statutory damages look like a better option, with maybe a decent chance of putting them out of business.
(Replies frozen) (Thread)
From:(Anonymous)
Date:November 4th, 2010 07:03 pm (UTC)
(Link)
they may, for all we know, have obtained other contents by similar malfeasance

They have. There is an ongoing list on Cooks Source's FB discussions page.
(Replies frozen) (Parent) (Thread)
Top of Page Powered by LiveJournal.com